ArticleScientific reports2025
Aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial keratitis at a referral centre in southern Sweden.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study evaluating the aetiology and antibiotic susceptibility in patients treated for suspected bacterial keratitis at Skåne University Hospital during 2019. Inclusion criteria: eyes with bacterial keratitis. Exclusion criteria: co-infection with other microbes. Primary outcome parameters: predisposing factors, causative pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility. Secondary outcome parameter: antibiotic treatment. A total of 255 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 149 (58%) occurred in contact lens wearers. Corneal cultures, when performed, were positive in 51% of cases. For eyes which had received antibiotic treatment prior to corneal culture (n = 36), the proportion of positive cultures was 50%. Ulcers < 1 mm were less likely to yield a positive culture than those ≥ 1 mm. The most frequently isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative staphylococci (48%). Antibiotic resistance rates were lowest to levofloxacin (0%), ciprofloxacin (2%) and chloramphenicol (4%), and highest to fusidic acid (47%) and clindamycin (19%). The low proportion of positive cultures from small ulcers suggests that these warrant a different diagnostic approach. Furthermore, corneal cultures from eyes with ongoing antibiotic treatment were positive to the same extent as those from untreated eyes, suggesting that discontinuation of antibiotic treatment before re-culturing might not be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.