ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of inflammatory serum parameters as a diagnostic tool in patients with endometriosis: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyphenol-Rich Wild Fruits of the Indian Himalayas as a Potential Nutraceutical Candidate for the Management of Endometriosis: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- sMICA/sMICB and Immune Checkpoint in Endometriosis: Toward a Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Model Based on Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though non-invasive prediction of endometriosis may seem technically feasible using sophisticated machine learning algorithms, a standard clinical use case for non-surgical diagnosis of endometriosis has not yet been established. In the present paper, we assess the potential of the inflammatory serum markers hepcidin, soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPar), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in a cohort of 87 patients. Hereby, 59 patients were histologically diagnosed with endometriosis, whereas other 28 patients served as our non-endometriosis control group. An initial exploratory univariate statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) revealed the diagnostic potential of different serum levels of suPar (p = 0.024) and IL-6 (p < 0.001) between both groups; the formation of a distinct training data set (n = 77) subsequently allowed to train a supervised machine learning analysis (tree classifier) employing serum levels of suPar, hepcidin, and IL-6 as predictor variables. Based on an internal 5-fold cross validation, the classifier performance was initially assessed using standard metrics such as sensitivity, positive predictive value, and AUROC curve. Additionally, the algorithm was tested on an external validation (holdout) data set (n = 10), showing sufficient overall accuracy of 80% without tendencies of overfitting. In conclusion, our data demonstrates the diagnostic potential of IL-6 and suPar as pro-inflammatory serum biomarkers in endometriosis. Using a decision tree-based supervised learning approach, we additionally present a straight-forward way of a potential clinical employment, aiming at less invasive (non-surgical) diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.