ArticleScientific reports2025
Cytotoxicity evaluation and metabolomic profiling of Spheciospongia vagabunda-associated fungi corroborated by in silico studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer incidence continues to increase every year. Scientists strive to search for new anticancer compounds to combat this disease. Appealingly, marine environmental niches are still an untapped scaffold for natural products with chemical and biomedical diversity. Hence, fungi isolated from the Red Sea sponge Spheciospongia vagabunda were explored. Two strains were purified from the sponge and identified, depending on 18 S rRNA gene sequence, as Aspergillus sp. (UR1) and Penicillium sp. (UR2). The obtained fungal extracts were submitted to LC-HR-ESI-MS metabolomics evaluation, which showed notable variation in the chemical profiles of both extracts. The cytotoxic activity was assessed against three cancer cell lines: HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma human), MCF7 (breast cancer) and CaCo-2 (human colon carcinoma), via MTT assay. UR1 extract displayed higher antiproliferative activity with IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.