ArticleScientific reports2025
Microfacies analysis and diagenetic history of Lower to Middle Eocene carbonates at Umm Russies area in the northeastern desert of Egypt.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated ERT, petrophysics and borehole logging for geotechnical zonation and sustainable coastal development in Ras El-Hekma, Egypt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stratigraphic and structural architecture of the inner ramp carbonates in the Northern Galala Plateau, Egypt: synergizing remote sensing and field data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An integrated study, incorporating field observations and petrographic analysis, has been conducted on the Lower-Middle Eocene carbonates of the Umm Russies area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt. These carbonate sequence represented, from base to top, by Minia, Gebel Hof, and Observatory formations, primarily consisting of marl, dolomite, and limestone. The microfacies analysis allowed the identification of seven distinct microfacies types: bioclastic floatstone, ferruginous dolomite, bioclastic packstone, ferruginous peloidal grainstone, sandy rudstone, foraminiferal wackestone, and bioclastic packstone. These microfacies types reflect a deposition in a wide range of environments from high-energy inner ramp to low-energy middle ramp settings. The performed petrographic analysis indicates that the investigated carbonate rocks underwent significant modification through a range of diagenetic processes, such as micritization, glauconitization, and dolomitization, representing marine-phreatic, meteoric-phreatic, burial, and meteoric-vadose environments. These environments are part of three successive diagenetic stages; eogenesis, mesogenesis, and telogenesis. The relationship between diagenetic episodes and depositional settings highlights that high-energy inner ramp environments facilitated early cementation and micritization, while middle ramp conditions promoted dissolution and neomorphism. Restricted platform margin environments favored dolomitization and glauconitization. Integrating microfacies analysis with these diagenetic interpretations facilitates reconstructing paleoenvironmental conditions and provides a framework for understanding carbonate rock formation in various geological settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.