ArticleScientific reports2025
Effective workflow from multimodal MRI data to model-based prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting human behavior from neuroimaging data remains a complex challenge in neuroscience. To address this, we propose a systematic and multi-faceted framework that incorporates a model-based workflow using dynamical brain models. This approach utilizes multi-modal MRI data for brain modeling and applies the optimized modeling outcome to machine learning. We demonstrate the performance of such an approach through several examples such as sex classification and prediction of cognition or personality traits. We in particular show that incorporating the simulated data into machine learning can significantly improve the prediction performance compared to using empirical features alone. These results suggest considering the output of the dynamical brain models as an additional neuroimaging data modality that complements empirical data by capturing brain features that are difficult to measure directly. The discussed model-based workflow can offer a promising avenue for investigating and understanding inter-individual variability in brain-behavior relationships and enhancing prediction performance in neuroimaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.