ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated oil spill detection using deep learning and SAR satellite data for the northern entrance of the Suez Canal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oil spills threaten marine ecosystems, demanding swift detection and response. The northern entrance of the Suez Canal, a critical maritime route, is increasingly at risk of frequent oil spill incidents. This study employs the DeepLabv3 + deep learning model to automatically detect oil spills in the study area based on Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery provided by the European Space Agency. The model was trained separately on two datasets: the European Maritime Safety Agency CleanSeaNet (EMSA-CSN) dataset, comprising 1100 oil spill incidents, and a localized dataset containing 1500 oil spill incidents that occurred at the Egyptian territorial waters. A comparative analysis between the two models was conducted using 30 oil spill test cases located within the study area. The model trained on Egyptian data outperformed the EMSA-CSN-data- trained model, achieving a loss of 0.0516, an accuracy of 98.14%, a mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 0.7872, and a significantly higher ROC area of 0.91, compared to a loss of 0.1152, an accuracy of 96.45%, a MIoU of 0.7161, and a ROC area of 0.76 for the EMSA-CSN model. In addition, the area prediction analysis confirmed the superior performance of the Egyptian-data-trained model, which estimated a total affected area of 421.20 km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.