ArticleScientific data2025
BoneDat, a database of standardized bone morphology for in silico analyses.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and sex-specific values of regional bone mineral density from opportunistic CT of the lower lumbar spine, pelvis, sacrum, and proximal femur.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- From pelvic geometry to modal compliance: sex-specific deformation pathways in the human pelvic ring.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Article
- BoneDat, a database of standardized bone morphology for in silico analyses.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In silico analysis is key to understanding bone structure-function relationships in orthopedics and evolutionary biology, but its potential is limited by a lack of standardized, high-quality human bone morphology datasets. This absence hinders research reproducibility and the development of reliable computational models. To overcome this, BoneDat has been developed. It is a comprehensive database containing standardized bone morphology data from 278 clinical lumbopelvic CT scans (pelvis and lower spine). The dataset includes individuals aged 16 to 91, balanced by sex across ten age groups. BoneDat provides curated segmentation masks, normalized bone geometry (volumetric meshes), and reference morphology templates organized by sex and age. By offering standardized reference geometry and enabling shape normalization, BoneDat enhances the repeatability and credibility of computational models. It also allows for integrating other open datasets, supporting the training and benchmarking of deep learning models and accelerating their path to clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.