ArticleNPJ breast cancer2025
Personalized neoadjuvant strategy using 70-gene assay to increase breast-conserving surgery in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Transcriptomics: From Human-in-the-Loop to Agentic AI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Can neoadjuvant endocrine therapy de-escalate surgery in luminal breast cancer? A four-year retrospective study from a single referral center.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Feasibility, reliability, and clinical value of genomic assay on pre-therapeutic biopsy for endocrine receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether tailored neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy [NCT] or endocrine therapy [NET]) guided by a 70-gene assay could improve breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates among patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer initially deemed ineligible for BCS. Of 130 prospectively enrolled patients (stage II-IIIA, across four Korean centers), 92 were analyzed. Patients classified as high genomic risk received NCT, while low-risk patients underwent NET (letrozole ± leuprolide for premenopausal women) for 16-24 weeks. The primary endpoint-achieving the surgeon-defined target tumor size for BCS-was reached in 69.6% (95% CI: 59.1-78.7%), significantly surpassing the predefined goal of 50.8% (p < 0.05). The actual overall BCS rate was 59.8% (64.7% NCT, 45.8% NET). Pathologic complete response occurred in 2.2%, exclusively in the NCT group. Thus, pretreatment genomic profiling effectively guided therapy selection, substantially increasing BCS eligibility while sparing low-risk patients unnecessary chemotherapy toxicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.