ArticleActa biomaterialia2025
Distinguishing shear and tensile myocardial wall stiffness using ex vivo anisotropic Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Shear Wave Elastography: Principles, Clinical Applications, and Practical Considerations for Interpretation.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Free-Breathing, 3D Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Myocardial Stiffness Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The organized myofiber structure within the myocardium indicates its mechanical anisotropy. By projecting the MR Elastography (MRE) stiffness matrix along either the myocardial fiber or sheet orientations determined by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), anisotropic MRE (aMRE) maps axial and transverse shear and Young's moduli into three tensile and six shear deformation modes. Ten healthy ex vivo swine hearts were imaged three times at 3T using MRE and DTI sequences. aMRE results showed a within-subject coefficient of variation at 19 % for the fiber model and 28 % for the sheet model across specimens and metrics, with coefficients lower than 15 % for seven of the ten specimens across models. Repeatability coefficient of ±0.5 kPa for Young's moduli and ±0.17 kPa for shear's moduli, demonstrating repeatability within the 95 % agreement limit. Isotropic MRE underestimated stiffnesses by 31 % compared to aMRE, where anisotropic moduli aligned more closely with prior finite element studies and some mechanical loading tests. The myocardium's anisotropic elasticity reflects with its helicoidal myofiber microstructure, with mid-wall circumferential fibers requiring twice the force to deform as longitudinal fibers at the epicardium or endocardium. At the mid-wall, fiber model values were μ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.