Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40541404›Full record

Observational studyBMJ health & care informatics2025

Validation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for predictive performance and risk stratification of sepsis using real-world data from hospitalised patients: a prospective observational study.

Ji-Hyun Kim, KyungHyun Lee, Kwang Joon Kim, Eun Yeong Ha, In-Cheol Kim, Sun Hyo Park, Chi-Heum Cho, Gyeong Im Yu, Byung Eun Ahn, Yeeun Jeong and 4 more

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ji-Hyun KimMedical Affairs, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-4317
KyungHyun LeeData Platform, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7010-5284
Kwang Joon KimAitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5554-8255
Eun Yeong HaInternal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-4329
In-Cheol KimInternal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-2328
Sun Hyo ParkInternal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-0652
Chi-Heum ChoKeimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-4099
Gyeong Im YuInternal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-3977
Byung Eun AhnAitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-7966
Yeeun JeongMedical Affairs, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8063-2233
Joo-Yun WonMedical Affairs, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-776X
Taeyong SimMedical Affairs, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7877-5053
Hochan ChoInternal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea hasej@aitrics.com hochan3632@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0712-7728
Ki-Byung LeeMedical Affairs, Aitrics Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea hasej@aitrics.com hochan3632@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-5528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe heterogeneous nature of sepsis renders determining its underlying causes difficult, which may delay diagnosis and intervention. VitalCare-SEPsis Score (VC-SEPS) is a deep learning-based algorithm that predicts sepsis and monitors patient conditions based on electronic medical record data. However, few studies have prospectively compared medical artificial intelligence software algorithms and traditional scoring systems to predict sepsis. This prospective observational study attempted to validate the predictive performance and risk stratification of VC-SEPS for early prediction of sepsis.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, we collected electronic medical record data from 6,797 patients hospitalised at Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, South Korea. The final version of the analysed set included 6,455 patients, 325 of whom were diagnosed with sepsis.

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of VC-SEPS was 0.880, indicating its superiority over traditional scoring systems. The algorithm performance showed a consistent trend within 24 hours. On patients' initial admission, the VC-SEPS was associated with the risk of developing sepsis, and the score accurately predicted sepsis by an average of 68.05 min compared with diagnosis time by an operational definition of sepsis. DISCUSSION: VC-SEPS could assist medical staff with early diagnosis and intervention in clinical practice by providing a sepsis risk score. Prompt recognition assisting recognition can significantly help shorten the time between recognition and intervention in clinical decision-making processes.

conclusionThis study suggests that using a clinical decision support system can help improve hospital workflows as well as the quality of medical care.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceSepsisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentROC CurveArtificial intelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDeep LearningInformation ScienceMedical Records

Identifiers

PMID40541404
PMCPMC12182025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.