Observational studyBMJ health & care informatics2025
Validation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for predictive performance and risk stratification of sepsis using real-world data from hospitalised patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Predictive Potential of an AI-Driven Deep Learning Model for Pneumonia-Associated Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hyper-inflammation and immunosuppression: redefining sepsis therapy using modern approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Drug-Drug Interactions and Individualized Clozapine Therapy in Patients with Depression: Insights from Real-World Data.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe heterogeneous nature of sepsis renders determining its underlying causes difficult, which may delay diagnosis and intervention. VitalCare-SEPsis Score (VC-SEPS) is a deep learning-based algorithm that predicts sepsis and monitors patient conditions based on electronic medical record data. However, few studies have prospectively compared medical artificial intelligence software algorithms and traditional scoring systems to predict sepsis. This prospective observational study attempted to validate the predictive performance and risk stratification of VC-SEPS for early prediction of sepsis.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, we collected electronic medical record data from 6,797 patients hospitalised at Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, South Korea. The final version of the analysed set included 6,455 patients, 325 of whom were diagnosed with sepsis.
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of VC-SEPS was 0.880, indicating its superiority over traditional scoring systems. The algorithm performance showed a consistent trend within 24 hours. On patients' initial admission, the VC-SEPS was associated with the risk of developing sepsis, and the score accurately predicted sepsis by an average of 68.05 min compared with diagnosis time by an operational definition of sepsis. DISCUSSION: VC-SEPS could assist medical staff with early diagnosis and intervention in clinical practice by providing a sepsis risk score. Prompt recognition assisting recognition can significantly help shorten the time between recognition and intervention in clinical decision-making processes.
conclusionThis study suggests that using a clinical decision support system can help improve hospital workflows as well as the quality of medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.