ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025
Prognostic factors in ALS: different approaches to the same problem.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural history of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the prognoses, and the survival times are fields of considerable interest that are scarcely studied in South American countries.To describe the survival of a representative cohort of Uruguayan ALS patients, and to identify covariates associated with survival using different analyses.Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Different Cox proportional hazards functions were used to identify independent prognostic predictors since the diagnosis: classic, stratified, and truncated.We included 166 definite and probable ALS patients. The median follow-up was of 13.6 years. An analysis was performed according to the recruitment groups: prevalent, exhaustive incident, and non-exhaustive incident cases. The median survival since the diagnosis was longer in the prevalent group (33 months) than in the exhaustive incident (22 months) and non-exhaustive incident (14 months) groups. The median survival time of the entire cohort from onset to death was 37 months and 23 months from the diagnosis. Factors related to survival from diagnosis to death were: age at onset, bulbar region onset, clinical form, and progression rate.The present study described the role of clinical and demographic factors in ALS survival in the Uruguayan population and shed light on differences involving survival models and the temporal bias produced by the lack of precision in determining the onset of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.