ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
In vivo measurement of vertebral deformation using digital tomosynthesis based digital volume correlation.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and associated with significant complications. Timely intervention is important to prevent vertebral fractures, however the current standard for assessing osteoporosis (bone mineral density) is not fully accurate for identifying at-risk individuals. Inspired by a laboratory technique combining microcomputed tomography with mechanical loading for mechanical assessment of extracted bone structures, digital tomosynthesis-based digital volume correlation (DTS-DVC) uses supine and standing DTS images of patients in combination with DVC. The current study evaluated in vivo precision errors, and the utility of DTS-DVC in identifying mechanically compromised vertebrae. Seven patients with vertebral fracture (Fx) and twelve without (NFx) were DTS-imaged, and endplate-to-endplate displacement, stiffness, compliance, and endplate distribution statistics were calculated using supine reference images and images acquired in supine, standing, standing while holding added weight. The in vivo measurement error of DTS-DVC metrics and the extent to which DTS-DVC can measure differences in vertebrae due to loading and presence of vertebral deformity (vertebral fracture) were examined. Total measurement error was low (0.017-0.019 mm), and all measured parameters changed with loading (p < 0.0001 to p < 0.05). Endplate-to-endplate displacement and displacement heterogeneity were significantly higher in fractured vs adjacent intact vertebrae. There were large differences in DVC variables between intact L1 vertebrae of Fx and NFx groups; however, these were not statistically demonstrable. Collectively, results support the in vivo feasibility of DTS-DVC and warrant further investigation. A biomechanics-based assessment of vertebral bone quality is expected to improve our understanding and clinical assessment of vertebral fracture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.