ArticleEpilepsy research2025
Antiseizure medication discontinuation: A mixed-methods exploration of factors considered by patients when approaching decision-making.
Article in Epilepsy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges in antiseizure medication discontinuation decisions: A qualitative study of clinicians who see patients with epilepsy.Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAntiseizure medications (ASMs) represent standard treatment for epilepsy. Yet, ASMs have adverse effects, and seizure risk decreases with longer seizure freedom. Guidelines consider ASM withdrawal after a period of seizure freedom. However, work exploring how patients approach this decision is scarce. We inquired what decision-making factors patients feel are relevant to ASM discontinuation.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study of adults seen for epilepsy, at least one-year seizure-free, across three academic institutions. This included a semi-structured interview script assessing attitudes towards seizures, ASMs, and ASM discontinuation.
resultsWe interviewed 32 participants. Factors supporting ASM discontinuation included current side effects (e.g., dizziness, sedation), concern regarding long-term adverse effects, teratogenicity, inconvenience from taking and refilling prescriptions, feeling like seizure freedom demonstrated that they were 'cured', or low concern regarding seizure consequences. However, many reasons supported continued treatment, e.g., fear of seizures and their psychosocial consequences, little perceived downside to taking ASMs, or overall more substantial pros than cons. Patients noted that they might consider discontinuing ASMs if the medication was known to cause severe adverse effects (e.g., cancer), or if the doctor could guarantee seizure freedom post-discontinuation.
conclusionNumerous themes emerged including reasons favoring continued ASMs (e.g., fear of seizures and their psychosocial consequences, perceiving little downside to continued ASMs) but also many reasons against continued ASMs (e.g., side effects, inconvenience). Discussions surrounding how long to continue ASMs should be highly individualized given the heterogeneity of patient preferences regarding treatment and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.