Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540739›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Participatory Intervention Development of a Peer-Guided Self-Help App for Anxiety Disorders: Mixed Methods Study.

Laura Duddeck, Timo Stolz, Christian Zottl, Thomas Berger, Johanna Boettcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura DuddeckDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-2525-3441
Timo StolzNullachtvierzehn Unternehmergesellschaft (Haftungsbeschränkt), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-2330
Christian ZottlDeutsche-Angsthilfe Eingetragener Verein, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3823-2152
Thomas Berger *Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2432-7791
Johanna Boettcher *Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8220-9291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety disorders affect approximately 27% of the global population, posing a major mental health challenge. Limited access to treatment due to resource constraints highlights the need for scalable solutions. Web-based self-help programs provide low-threshold access to evidence-based strategies. When guided by peers, these programs enhance engagement and acceptability by merging autonomy with support. Peer-guided self-help apps offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional care, reaching those who might otherwise remain untreated.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the development of a peer-guided self-help app for anxiety, incorporating input from individuals with lived experience. It assesses user feedback on usability and helpfulness during the development process.

methodsThe intervention was developed in 3 iterative stages using the integrate, design, assess, and share framework. In stage 1, a prototype was cocreated by employees of a German self-help organization with lived experience, software engineers, and psychologists. In stage 2, qualitative feedback was collected from a focus group (n=5) and interviews (n=4), with participants recruited through group leaders of the organization. The research team directly contacted the participants. Qualitative data were analyzed with inductive and deductive content analysis (interrater reliability Cohen κ=0.88), which informed the minimum viable product (MVP) development. In stage 3, the MVP was pilot-tested with a larger online sample (N=126) recruited via the organization's website, accessible to all. Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and well-being (the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index) were assessed at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Use metrics (eg, log-ins, time spent, and feature use) were recorded automatically. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively.

resultsStage 1 produced no data. In stage 2, feedback revealed unclear functionality, confusion in peer interaction, and safety concerns, leading to MVP revisions. In stage 3 (N=126), engagement was low-average log-ins were 3.15 (SD 14.37), with only 20 (SD 15.9) participants completing follow-ups. While many joined exposure (79/126, 62.7%) or activity scheduling groups (104/126, 82.5%), 123 (98.4%) did not send messages, undermining peer support goals. Baseline scores showed moderate anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7: mean 10.52, SD 5.15), low well-being (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index: mean 15.80, SD 6.17), and low social support (Oslo Social Support Scale-3: mean 7.25, SD 2.68), consistent with the target group. Low engagement and high attrition indicated usability problems and limited perceived value.

conclusionsDespite rapid sign-ups, user engagement was low and dropout rates high, indicating poor acceptance. Key barriers included user confusion, underused peer features, and technical issues. Future development should include structured onboarding for better clarity. Peer engagement be improved with prompts and enhanced safety perception. The participatory approach was challenging and fell short of expectations. Smaller testing phases with regular user feedback will ensure user-centered refinement. Insights from successful peer communities can inform a more intuitive, engaging design.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMobile ApplicationsPeer GroupSelf CareAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchanxiety self-managementdigital mental health interventionintegrate, design, assess, and share frameworkparticipatory designpeer-guided self-helpqualitative usability studyuser engagement

Identifiers

PMID40540739
PMCPMC12228002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.