ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Characterizing DNA Origami Nanostructures in TEM Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- De novo design of DNA origami with a generative diffusion model.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Assisted DNA Origami Shape Sorting Using Fingerprinting Nanosensors and Feature Engineering.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Machine learning-powered single-molecule cancer diagnosis using DNA origami tags.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models remain an emerging strategy to accelerate materials design and development. We demonstrate that CNN models can characterize DNA origami nanostructures employed in programmable self-assembly, which is important in many applications such as in biomedicine. Specifically, we benchmark the performance of 9 CNN models, namely, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, and ResNet152 to characterize the ligation number of DNA origami nanostructures in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. We first pretrain CNN models using a large image data set of 720 images from our coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Then, we fine-tune the pretrained CNN models, using a small experimental TEM data set with 146 TEM images. All CNN models were found to have similar computational time requirements, although their model sizes and performances are different. We use 20 test MD images to demonstrate that among all of the pretrained CNN models, ResNet50 and VGG16 have the highest and second-highest accuracies. Among the fine-tuned models, VGG16 was found to have the highest agreement with the test TEM images. Thus, we conclude that fine-tuned VGG16 models can quickly characterize the number of ligation sites of nanostructures in large TEM images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.