Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540709›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Characterizing DNA Origami Nanostructures in TEM Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Xingfei Wei, Qiankun Mo, Chi Chen, Mark Bathe, Rigoberto Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingfei WeiDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-1579
Qiankun MoDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-6565-8662
Chi ChenDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6126-1824
Mark BatheDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-6855
Rigoberto HernandezDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8526-7414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models remain an emerging strategy to accelerate materials design and development. We demonstrate that CNN models can characterize DNA origami nanostructures employed in programmable self-assembly, which is important in many applications such as in biomedicine. Specifically, we benchmark the performance of 9 CNN models, namely, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, and ResNet152 to characterize the ligation number of DNA origami nanostructures in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. We first pretrain CNN models using a large image data set of 720 images from our coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Then, we fine-tune the pretrained CNN models, using a small experimental TEM data set with 146 TEM images. All CNN models were found to have similar computational time requirements, although their model sizes and performances are different. We use 20 test MD images to demonstrate that among all of the pretrained CNN models, ResNet50 and VGG16 have the highest and second-highest accuracies. Among the fine-tuned models, VGG16 was found to have the highest agreement with the test TEM images. Thus, we conclude that fine-tuned VGG16 models can quickly characterize the number of ligation sites of nanostructures in large TEM images.

Indexed as

DNAMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanostructuresNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationDNA

Identifiers

PMID40540709
PMCPMC12266051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.