ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2025
Characterization of Global Research Trends and Prospects on Prone Positioning in Respiratory Failure: Bibliometric Analysis.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of prone versus supine position during enteral nutrition on clinical outcomes and complications in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Scientific and Technological Developments in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Dual Bibliometric Analysis of Articles and Patents.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prone positioning has emerged as a crucial intervention in managing acute respiratory failure, especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome and patients with COVID-19. Given the increasing interest in this field, it is important to characterize global research trends and key contributors to identify future research directions. Objective: This study aimed to analyze global research trends, collaboration networks, and research hotspots related to prone positioning in respiratory failure through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Methods: Bibliometric analyses were conducted using CiteSpace and Biblioshiny software on publications up to December 31, 2023, from the Web of Science Core Collection, focusing on prone positioning in respiratory failure. Results: A total of 1263 research articles were identified, published in 50 countries by numerous institutions. The United States, France, and Germany contributed the most publications, with the United States producing 21.9% (275/1263) of the total. Key authors such as Claude Guerin and Luciano Gattinoni were identified as major contributors to the field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis revealed the dynamic nature of prone positioning research in respiratory failure. It highlighted protective ventilation and COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome as emerging hotspots, indicating a shift in focus during the pandemic. Conclusions: This study revealed a rapidly growing body of literature on prone positioning in respiratory failure, especially in the context of COVID-19. The findings underscore the importance of further multicenter clinical trials to validate current practices and refine treatment protocols. In addition, the application of prone positioning in non-intubated patients represents a potential future research direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.