Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540458›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

SARS-CoV-2 survival on skin and its transfer from contaminated surfaces.

Ana K Pitol, Samiksha Venkatesan, Siobhan Richards, Michael Hoptroff, Amitabha Majumdar, Grant L Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana K PitolLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-5677
Samiksha VenkatesanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Siobhan RichardsLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Michael HoptroffUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-6221
Amitabha MajumdarUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, United Kingdom.
Grant L HughesLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-7185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, particularly its transfer from contaminated surfaces (fomites) to human skin, is crucial for mitigating the spread of COVID-19. While extensive research has examined the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on various surfaces, there is limited understanding of how efficiently it transfers to human skin, and how long it survives on the skin. This study investigates two key aspects of SARS-CoV-2 transmission: (1) the transfer efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 from non-porous (plastic and metal) and porous (cardboard) surfaces to a 3D human skin model (LabSkin), and (2) the survival of SARS-CoV-2 on the skin under different temperature conditions. First, we validated LabSkin as a suitable surrogate for human skin by comparing the transfer efficiency of the bacteriophage Phi 6 from surfaces to LabSkin and to human volunteers' fingers. No significant differences were observed, confirming LabSkin's suitability for these studies. Subsequently, the transfer of SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces to LabSkin was assessed, showing that plastic and metal surfaces had similar transfer efficiencies (~13%), while no transfer occurred from cardboard once the inoculum had dried on the surface. Finally, the survival of SARS-CoV-2 on skin was assessed, showing a rapid decay at higher temperatures, with a half-life ranging from 2.8 to 17.8 hours depending on the temperature. These findings enhance our understanding of viral transmission via fomites and inform public health strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through surface contact.

Indexed as

COVID-19FomitesSARS-CoV-2SkinHumansTemperature

Identifiers

PMID40540458
PMCPMC12180721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.