ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Secondary Pituitary Abscess Inside a Macroadenoma Complicated by Postoperative Hemorrhage and Reinfection: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pituitary abscess is a rare, potentially life-threatening condition that is challenging to diagnose on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, we present a case of pituitary abscess within an adenoma with a complicated postoperative course. CASE REPORT A 72-year-old man with progressive headache and left-eye visual field deficit underwent MRI, which revealed a parasellar region lesion compressing the optic chiasm, suggesting a pituitary macroadenoma. An endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach was used for total tumor resection, during which purulent material was evacuated. Pathology confirmed a pituitary adenoma, and microbiology identified Proteus mirabilis and Cutibacterium acnes. Postoperatively, the patient's vision did not improve due to a hemorrhage in the postoperative bed necessitating reoperation. Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated from the second procedure. Following hematoma evacuation, his vision improved. CONCLUSIONS Pituitary abscess within an adenoma is rare and difficult to diagnose with MRI. Symptoms overlap with those of pituitary adenomas and abscesses, making clinical recognition challenging. Management requires prompt abscess drainage, lesion resection, and prolonged antibiotic therapy. This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and not focusing on a single suspected pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.