ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Hyper-Cross-linked Cellulose Nanofibrils with Spontaneous and Reversible Adsorption of Aromatic Pollutants from Water as a Valid Alternative to Fossil-Based Adsorbents.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetic amino-functionalized hyper-crosslinked resin as a reusable adsorbent for methylene blue.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a novel high surface area adsorbent based on cellulose and inspired by hyper-cross-linked polymers was designed. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) were functionalized with poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) and hyper-cross-linked through Friedel-Crafts alkylation, yielding a micro/mesoporous material characterized by a specific surface area of 409 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.