Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540284›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Private Equity Acquisition of Gastroenterology Practices and Colonoscopy Price and Quality.

Daniel R Arnold, Brent D Fulton, Ola A Abdelhadi, Arjun Teotia, Richard M Scheffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel R ArnoldDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Brent D FultonSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Ola A AbdelhadiStanford University, Stanford, California.
Arjun TeotiaHenry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Richard M SchefflerSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Private equity (PE) has rapidly been acquiring physician practices in the US, but a full understanding of its association with health care prices, spending, utilization, and quality is still unknown. Objective: To examine changes in colonoscopy prices, spending, utilization, and quality associated with PE acquisition of gastroenterology practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This difference-in-differences event study and economic evaluation analyzed data from US gastroenterology practices that were acquired by PE firms between 2015 and 2021. Commercial claims covering more than 50 million enrollees were used to calculate price, spending, utilization, and quality measures from 2012 to 2021. The data were analyzed between April 2024 and September 2024. Exposures: PE acquisition of gastroenterology practices. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were price, spending per physician, number of colonoscopies per physician, number of unique patients per physician, and quality (polypectomy detection, incomplete colonoscopies, and 4 adverse event measures: cardiovascular, serious gastroenterology, nonserious gastroenterology, and any adverse event). Results: Data from more than 1.1 million patients (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [8.4] years; 47.8% male patients) undergoing 1.3 million colonoscopies were analyzed. The sample included 718 851 treated colonoscopies conducted by 1494 physicians among 590 900 patients across 1240 PE-acquired practice sites and 637 990 control colonoscopies conducted by 2550 physicians among 527 380 patients across 2657 independent practice sites. Colonoscopy prices at PE-acquired gastroenterology practices increased by 4.5% (95% CI, 2.5%-6.6%; P < .001) relative to independent gastroenterology practices. The estimated price effect increased to 6.7% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.3%; P < .001) when considering only colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists in PE-acquired practices with market shares above the 75th percentile (24.4%) in 2021 as treated. Colonoscopy spending per physician increased by 16.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-24.0%; P < .001), while the number of colonoscopies and the number of unique patients per physician increased by 12.1% (95% CI, 5.3%-19.4%; P < .001) and 11.3% (95% CI, 4.4%-18.5%; P < .001), respectively; however, these spending and utilization measures were already increasing prior to PE acquisition. No statistically significant associations were detected for the 6 quality measures analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation, PE acquisition of gastroenterology practices led to higher prices and spending but had no discernible effect on quality. Policymakers may be well advised to monitor PE investment in physician practices given the increase in prices and spending without a commensurate increase in quality.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyGastroenterologyPrivate PracticeQuality of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40540284
PMCPMC12181784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.