Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540258›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures: Prevalence and Associations in the Adult Population of the Beijing Eye Study.

Jost B Jonas, Songhomitra Panda-Jonas, Dan Milea, Cédric Lamirel, Jie Xu, Rahul A Jonas, Ya Xing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optic disc morphology and myopia severity in eyes with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MiR-21-5p promotes RPE cell necroptosis by targeting Peli1 in a rat model of AMD.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jost B JonasRothschild Foundation Hospital, Institut Français de Myopie, Paris, France.
Songhomitra Panda-JonasPrivatpraxis Prof Jonas und Dr. Panda-Jonas, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dan MileaRothschild Foundation Hospital, Institut Français de Myopie, Paris, France.
Cédric LamirelRothschild Foundation Hospital, Institut Français de Myopie, Paris, France.
Jie XuBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China.
Rahul A JonasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ya Xing WangBeijing Visual Science and Translational Eye Research Institute (BERI), Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess prevalence and associations of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) on optical coherence tomographic images in a general adult population. Methods: Participants in the population-based Beijing Eye Study underwent ocular and systemic examinations. Using optical coherence tomographic optic nerve head images, we assessed presence and location of PHOMS. Results: The study included 963 eyes (age, 64.1 ± 9.5 years; axial length, 23.05 ± 1.02 mm). PHOMS detected in 15 eyes (1.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-2.1) extended over 30°, 60°, and 90° in 4 (27%), 6 (40%), and 5 (33%) eyes, respectively. The PHOMS were located at 2 o'clock (referring to right eyes) in two (13%), at 3:00 h (n = 1), 5:30 h (n = 1), 6:00 h (n = 2), 6:30 h (n = 1), 7:00 h (n = 2), 8:00 h (n = 1), 8:30 h (n = 2), 9:30 h (n = 2), and at 10:30 h (n = 1). On multivariable analysis, higher PHOMS prevalence was associated with smaller optic disc size (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.28; P < 0.001), thicker peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P = 0.004), thicker retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch's membrane complex thickness (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.19-2.43; P = 0.04), and longer axial length (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.12-4.08; P = 0.02). It was not associated with best-corrected visual acuity, perimetric indices, or any other ocular or systemic parameter or disease examined. Conclusions: PHOMS are relatively rare in the general adult and elderly population and mainly associated with a small optic disc. They are not related to a decrease in visual function or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and they do not indicate an optic nerve damage. They are unrelated to other major ocular and systemic diseases, although they may be due to a localized crowding of peripapillary nerve fibers in eyes with small (crowded) optic discs.

Indexed as

Optic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBeijingChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersPrevalenceRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID40540258
PMCPMC12184797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.