Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540232›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2025

Do the receptive fields in the primary visual cortex span a variability over the degree of elongation of the receptive fields?

Tony Lindeberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tony LindebergComputational Brain Science Lab, Division of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden. tony@kth.se.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-2170

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2022-02969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the results of combining (i) theoretical analysis regarding connections between the orientation selectivity and the elongation of receptive fields for the affine Gaussian derivative model with (ii) biological measurements of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex to investigate if (iii) the receptive fields can be regarded as spanning a variability in the degree of elongation. From an in-depth theoretical analysis of idealized models for the receptive fields of simple and complex cells in the primary visual cortex, we established that the orientation selectivity becomes more narrow with increasing elongation of the receptive fields. Combined with previously established biological results, concerning broad vs. sharp orientation tuning of visual neurons in the primary visual cortex, as well as previous experimental results concerning distributions of the resultant of the orientation selectivity curves for simple and complex cells, we show that these results are consistent with the receptive fields spanning a variability over the degree of elongation of the receptive fields. We also show that our principled theoretical model for visual receptive fields leads to qualitatively similar types of deviations from a uniform histogram of the resultant descriptor of the orientation selectivity curves for simple cells, as can be observed in the results from biological experiments. To firmly investigate the validity of the underlying working hypothesis, we finally formulate a set of testable predictions for biological experiments, to characterize the predicted systematic variability in the elongation over the orientation maps in higher mammals, and its relations to the pinwheel structure.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsOrientationPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexVisual FieldsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationVisual PathwaysComplex cellElongationOrientation selectivityPinwheelReceptive fieldSimple cell

Identifiers

PMID40540232
PMCPMC12417286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.