Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540205›Full record

SynthesisCurrent pain and headache reports2025

Low Dose Naltrexone In The Management Of Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

Naveen Chandrashekar Hegde, Archana Mishra, Divya V, Rituparna Maiti, Debasish Hota, Anand Srinivasan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naveen Chandrashekar HegdeDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-122X
Archana MishraDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Divya VDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5476-9679
Rituparna MaitiDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Debasish HotaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7339-1773
Anand SrinivasanDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India. anandsrinivasan@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChronic pain conditions are among the leading causes of years lost to disability. Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. LDN, by blocking Toll-Like Receptors (TLR), prevents central sensitization and conversion of acute pain state to a state of chronic pain. This meta-analysis compared LDN's effectiveness in chronic pain syndromes based on published randomized trials.

methodSeven studies were included after a systematic search and screening from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries. The efficacy outcome analyzed was the standardized mean difference (SMD), the Cohen's d, of change in pain scores between LDN and the comparator drugs using the random-effect model. Subgroup analyses by condition type and comparator were performed to analyze the effect of LDN. Adverse events were evaluated using incidence rate ratio(IRR), publication bias by funnel plot, risk of bias by Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0, and certainty of evidence by GRADE evaluation.

resultsLDN did not show a significant difference in pain response compared to control groups [d = -0.11 (95%CI -0.96 to 0.74); P = 0.31]. In fibromyalgia, LDN had improvement compared to placebo [d = -0.34 (95%CI -0.62 to -0.06); P = 0.0186]. Against active comparators, LDN had no difference [d = 0.67 (95% CI -4.69 to 6.02); P = 0.35]. Adverse events were increased with LDN compared to placebo [IRR = 1.4 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.75); P = 0.0026] but comparable to active comparators [IRR = 0.55 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.31); P = 0.65].

conclusionLDN is better than placebo in fibromyalgia pain management, and LDN is similar to active controls in chronic pain management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024511451.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsFibromyalgiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsChronic painFibromyalgiaLow dose naltrexoneMeta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.