ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Language Barriers in the Delivery of Musculoskeletal Care and Future Directions.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Traditional Healers in Musculoskeletal Care for Hispanic and Latino/a Americans: A Systematic Review.JBJS reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Availability of Online Spanish Language Resources in Academic Hand Surgery.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewExamine how language barriers impact musculoskeletal care in the United States, particularly for patients with non-English language preference (NELP), and to highlight strategies to improve equity in orthopaedic outcomes. RECENT
findingsIn the U.S., 24.5 million individuals have NELP, yet few orthopaedic surgeons are proficient in non-English languages. NELP is consistently associated with worse postoperative outcomes, lower patient-reported outcome scores, and disparities in access to care. Studies have shown that language discordance contributes to miscommunication, reduced satisfaction, and suboptimal recovery. Despite federal mandates requiring interpreter services, access remains inconsistent, and many institutions fall short in providing language-concordant care. Recent research supports interventions such as professional interpreter use, language-concordant provider matching, multilingual discharge instructions, validated non-English PROMs, as well as the use of artificial intelligence. Language-related disparities in orthopaedic surgery are well-documented but under-addressed. Improving equity for patients with NELP will require system-wide efforts to standardize interpreter access, expand language-concordant care, and integrate emerging tools such as artificial intelligence to support communication across the surgical continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.