Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540183›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.

Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megan C EdmondsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. edmondsm2@vcu.edu.
Maimah KarmoTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.
Belinda PaulicinTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.
Lizzie WittigTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.
Karla FunezIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ayres WarrenAmherst College, Amherst, USA.
Sue SteeleTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.
Amanda Espenshied-ReillyDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Shanda Cooper GoffTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.
Virginia LeechTigerlily Foundation, Reston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Status DisparitiesPatient AdvocacyPatient ParticipationAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMiddle AgedWhiteBlack womenBreast cancer survivorHealth disparitiesPatient-advocatesSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40540183
PMCPMC12971730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.