Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540136›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Biotechnological breakthroughs in rice disease management: an overview from transgenics to CRISPR.

Vignesh Ponnurangan, Raghunandhan Namachivayam, R K Mohana Pradeep, David Jesudoss, Kokiladevi Eswaran, Arul Loganathan, Krish K Kumar, Paranidharan Vaikuntavasan, Djanaguiraman Maduraimuthu, Varanavasiappan Shanmugam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vignesh PonnuranganDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Raghunandhan NamachivayamDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
R K Mohana PradeepDepartment of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
David JesudossDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Kokiladevi EswaranDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Arul LoganathanDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Krish K KumarDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Paranidharan VaikuntavasanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Djanaguiraman MaduraimuthuDepartment of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Varanavasiappan ShanmugamDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India. varanavasiappan.s@tnau.ac.in.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India BT/PR40456/ AGIII/103/1248/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice production faces persistent challenges due to a plethora of infectious agents, which cause substantial economic losses and pose significant threats to food security. Effective management of rice diseases is hindered by the lack of resistant sources and the slow pace of conventional breeding, which often fails to keep up with the rapid evolution of pathogens. Although transgenic approaches have contributed to disease resistance, they are limited by regulatory hurdles and public concern over the use of genetically modified organisms. Emerging genome-editing technologies, particularly CRISPR/Cas systems, offer promising alternatives by enabling the precise modification of native genes involved in plant susceptibility. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated inactivation of negative defense regulators, such as SWEET and ERF family genes, conferred broad-spectrum disease resistance. This review discusses the use of CRISPR/Cas technologies in developing disease-resistant rice varieties, along with emerging approaches and databases relevant to genome editing in plant research. Furthermore, it also highlights recent developments in CRISPR-based diagnostics for pathogen detection and the regulatory frameworks for the commercialization of edited crops. Overall, it underscores the transformative potential of CRISPR technologies in developing elite, climate-resilient rice cultivars, thereby supporting sustainable disease management and global food security.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCRISPR-Cas SystemsOryzaPlant DiseasesDisease ResistanceGene EditingPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR/CasDetectionDisease resistanceRiceTransgenic approaches

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.