Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540120›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2025

The Ongoing Expansion of the Medically Important Scorpions in Southern South America.

Alexis Emanuel Barrios-Montivero, Pablo Ariel Martínez, Andrés Alejandro Ojanguren-Affilastro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis Emanuel Barrios-MontiveroDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Catamarca, Catamarca, Argentina.
Pablo Ariel MartínezPIBi Lab - Laboratorio de Pesquisas Integrativas em Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil.
Andrés Alejandro Ojanguren-AffilastroMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia", Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, CP: 1405 DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ojanguren@macn.gov.ar.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2019-0597Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIP 2021-2023 11220200101990CO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We revise the expansion of synanthropic medically important species of Scorpions of genus Tityus in southern South America: Tityus bahiensis (Perty 1833), Tityus carrilloi Ojanguren-Affilastro 2021, Tityus confluens Borelli 1899, Tityus costatus (Karsch, 1879), Tityus serrulatus Lutz & Mello, 1922, and Tityus trivittatus Kraepelin 1898, which due to their synanthropic capabilities we regard as invasive species. We also build species distribution models (SMDs) from bioclimatic variables using Maxent. We also included the human density variable in the model, because medically important species in the area are synanthropic, being more common in urban areas than in natural environments. We present their current suitable areas and the potential future distribution up to 2070. According to our analyses most species will expand in the close future, reaching countries without Scorpionism problems, such as Chile and Uruguay. We conclude that, besides synanthropic capabilities, parthenogenesis is the main factor favoring the expansion of some of these species. We also conclude that interactions between invasive Tityus species may hinder their expansion process due to potential competition or exclusion mechanisms.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesScorpionsAnimalsHumansSouth Americaclimate changeparthenogenesisscorpionismsinanthropic TityusSouth Americaspecies distribution modelingurbanization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.