Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540057›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Assessing Pandemic Impacts to Collaborative Management in Parks and Protected Areas.

Allie McCreary, Erin Seekamp, Michael B Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allie McCrearyCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. aem0200@auburn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-3999
Erin SeekampCollege of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5082-1921
Michael B EdwardsCollege of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0974-4009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partnerships are key in helping public land management agencies complete mission-critical conservation work and maintain agency relevancy through community engagement. While there had been a growing trend toward collaboration for many public agencies, the COVID-19 pandemic challenged the ability of volunteers and other groups to work with land management personnel. This study examined public agency personnel's reported work accomplishments with partners and perceptions of partnerships before (2019), during (2020), and the year after (2021) the pandemic. Results indicate that partnership engagement on conservation-related tasks declined during the pandemic. While the volume of work somewhat recovered in 2021, there remained impacts to the types of partners personnel worked with and to personnel's perceptions of institutional emphasis on partnerships. Implications for public agencies and their partners include increased emphasis on finding partnership 'champions' within the agency and umbrella organizations outside of the agency to facilitate partnership arrangements.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCooperative BehaviorCOVID-19Parks, RecreationalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2ConservationCOVID-19PartnershipsPublic lands

Identifiers

PMID40540057
PMCPMC12259788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.