ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
Implementation of the national community health policy in Guinea: a decision space analysis of the roles and responsibilities of community health workers.
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health center staff perceptions of gender and equity in the Conakry health region, Guinea (2025): a cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCommunity health workers (CHW) are crucial for universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. Decentralization supports this goal but can cause issues if local actors misunderstand their roles. This study explores how Guinea's local health system actors understood and executed their responsibilities in delivering community health services from 2017 to 2021.
methodsThis is a subanalysis of 168 CHW from a larger study of 522 respondents on the implementation of community health policy in Guinea. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to assess the knowledge, involvement, and decision space of national community health policy actors, focusing on CHW and community volunteers (Relais communautaires [RECO]). This analysis was guided by decision space theory and explored both de jure (formal) and de facto (actual) decision-making. De jure decision space refers to the choices authorized by official strategies, policies, or laws, while de facto decision space reflects the choices reported by local actors in practice.
resultsAcross all commune types, CHW and RECO demonstrated high knowledge and implementation levels of their roles in community health. Contrary to the initial hypothesis that fully implemented communes would have the highest decision-making space, commune type was not the primary determinant of decision-making space for CHW and RECO. The presence of CHW was positively associated with greater de jure and de facto decision-making space and enhanced capacity (p = 0.050). Univariate analysis showed that increased BCG vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against tuberculosis) was significantly associated with expanded de jure decision-making space (p = 0.041). Bivariate (p = 0.014) and multivariate (p = 0.011) analyses revealed that higher pentavalent vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b) was also significantly associated with a larger de jure decision-making space.
conclusionIn countries with decentralized responsibilities, it is crucial for community health actors to understand their decision-making range to improve health outcomes. Also, ensuring sufficient and consistent capacity and funding is essential to enhance health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.