Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540028›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.

Gabriella Annandale, Susanna Kola-Palmer, Éilish Duke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Yonder: Access and quality of life, vaccine hesitancy, SABAs and acute cardiovascular events, and air quality.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriella AnnandaleDepartment of Psychology, School of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-5928-7201
Susanna Kola-PalmerSchool of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Éilish DukeDepartment of Psychology, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to public health. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated vaccinations marked a watershed moment for vaccine hesitancy, with highly publicized anti-vaccine protests, and widespread misinformation and distrust of the novel vaccines. This mixed-method survey sought to provide a nuanced understanding of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant vaccine adopters in the context of the COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCoronavirus vaccinationmisinformationmixed methodsside effect concernsvaccine hesitancyvaccine hesitant adopters

Identifiers

PMID40540028
PMCPMC12915811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.