Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40540027›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

PET/CT imaging of esophageal cancer targeting tumor cell specific αvβ6-integrin expression.

Kateřina Dvořáková Bendová, Tanja Groll, Barbora Neužilová, Kristýna Krasulová, Zbyněk Nový, Falco Reissig, Katja Steiger, Melanie Boxberg, Elisabeth Eppard, Jan Wuestemann and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Radioligand therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using an αvβ6-integrin targetingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kateřina Dvořáková Bendová *Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Tanja Groll *Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Barbora NeužilováInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Kristýna KrasulováInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zbyněk NovýInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Falco ReissigTRIMT GmbH, Carl-Eschebach-Str. 7, 01454, Radeberg, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Melanie BoxbergInstitute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth EppardDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jan WuestemannDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Marián HajdúchInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Jakub ŠimečekTRIMT GmbH, Carl-Eschebach-Str. 7, 01454, Radeberg, Germany.
Michael C KreisslDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. michael.kreissl@med.ovgu.de.
Miloš PetříkInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. milos.petrik@upol.cz.
Johannes NotniInstitute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. jn@trimt.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3964-3391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the potential of αvβ6-integrin as a theranostic target in esophageal cancer.

methodsMembranous β6-integrin (ITGB6) expression was analyzed in 306 specimens of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) from 100 patient cases (1, 37, 58, and 4 of grade G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively). Ga-68 labeling of D0103 was done manually for preclinical experiments and fully automated for clinical application. Preclinical characterization of Ga-68-D0103 was performed in SCID mice bearing subcutaneous xenografts of H2009 (αvβ6-positive) or MDA-MB-231 (αvβ6-negative) carcinoma cell lines, by ex vivo biodistribution (10, 30, 90, and 180 min p.i) and PET imaging (30, 90, and 180 min p.i.)., without and with co-injection of gelofusine (4% succinylated gelatin). A patient with type-II diabetes (f, 68y, 115 kg) with proximal G2 ESCC was investigated by Ga-68-D0103 PET/CT (193 MBq) at 15, 45, 90, and 104 min p.i..

results99% of ESCC cases were found β6-integrin positive by IHC, of which 48%, 31%, and 20% showed strong, moderate, and low ITGB6 expression, respectively, with no correlation to tumor grade. Ex vivo biodistribution of Ga-68-D0103 in H2009 xenografted mice after 30, 90, and 180 min showed tumor-to-blood ratios of 6.8, 37, and 124, respectively; tumor-to-muscle ratios of 12, 14, and 36, respectively; tumor-to-liver ratios of 10, 17, and 14, respectively; and tumor-to-pancreas ratios of 20, 47, and 56, respectively. Co-administration of gelofusine did not change the tumor uptake but reduced the kidney uptake by 89% (from 178%iA/g to 19.1%iA/g, 90 min p.i.), resulting in an 8.7-fold higher tumor/kidney ratio. µPET imaging in H2009 xenografted mice confirmed a high tumor uptake and low background already 30 min p.i.. Blockade biodistribution and µPET in αvβ6-(-) MDA-MB-231 mice demonstrated target specificity. Clinical PET/CT of a patient with ESCC showed increasing tracer uptake over time in the primary tumor (SUVmax 9.0 and 11.3 at 15 and 104 min p.i., respectively) and in a lymph node metastasis (SUVmax 19.5 and 28.3, respectively), and a decreasing blood pool activity (SUVmean 2.75 and 0.98, respectively).

conclusionsHigh (99%) membranous expression frequency and density on tumor cells underscores the potential of αvβ6-integrin as a theranostic target in ESCC, suggesting that αvβ6-integrin PET/CT imaging may adopt a role in re-staging and therapy guidance in this cancer type. The prolonged tumor retention furthermore indicates a therapeutic potential of αvβ6-integrin targeted radiopharmaceuticals when labeled with radionuclides such as lutetium-177, terbium-161, or actinium-225.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmEsophageal NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticIntegrinsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedTissue DistributionAntigens, NeoplasmGallium Radioisotopesintegrin alphavbeta6IntegrinsEsophageal CancerIntegrinsPositron Emission TomographySurveillanceTheranostics

Identifiers

PMID40540027
PMCPMC12660471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.