ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2025
Leveraging machine learning to uncover the hidden links between trusting behavior and biological markers.
Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperbaric oxygen intervention enhances cooperative gains in high-trust people at high altitude: the role of medial prefrontal interbrain synchrony.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Trial
- Blood-Based Metabolomic Biomarkers and Personality Traits in Major Depressive Disorder: Toward an Integrated Framework for Precision Psychiatry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the decision-making mechanisms underlying trust is essential, particularly for individuals with mental disorders who often experience difficulties in forming interpersonal trust. In this study, we aimed to explore biomarkers associated with trust-based decision-making through quantitative analysis. However, quantifying internal decision-making processes is challenging, as they are not directly observable. To address this, we developed a machine learning method based on a Bayesian hierarchical model to quantitatively infer latent decision-making parameters from behavioural data collected during a trust game. Applying this method to data from patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls (HCs), we estimated individualised model parameters that regulate trust-related decisions. The model successfully predicted participants' behaviours in the task. Although no significant group-level differences were observed in the estimated parameters between the MDD and HC groups, we uncovered hidden links between trust-related decision-making processes and specific blood biomarkers. Notably, metabolites such as 5-aminolevulinic acid, acetylcarnitine, and 2-aminobutyric acid were significantly associated with individual differences in trusting behaviour. These findings provide valuable insight into the biological basis of trust-based decision-making. They also offer a novel framework for integrating behavioural modelling with biomarker discovery, potentially informing the development of targeted interventions to enhance social functioning and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.