ReviewCurrent opinion in allergy and clinical immunology2025
Management of patients with tuberculosis medication-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.
Review in Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epicutaneous and Drug Provocation Testing in Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: A 20-Year Single-Centre Experience.Contact dermatitis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTuberculosis (TB) incidence is rising globally, and TB medication-associated drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) presents a significant clinical challenge, particularly in people living with HIV (PLH). Treatment interruption during active TB, especially with comorbid immunosuppression can be detrimental. This review highlights global variations in management practices and emphasizes the need for a more personalized approach to care. RECENT
findingsTimely cessation of the suspected medication, supportive care, and topical corticosteroids remain central to DRESS management. However, the routine use of systemic corticosteroids remains debated, as good outcomes from topical steroids alone have been observed, especially in TB/HIV co-infected patients. Efforts to reduce TB treatment interruption have driven interest in the use of shortened TB regimens, sequential additive drug challenge (SADC) with stat dose intravenous corticosteroids to limit positive drug challenge morbidity, and even desensitization protocols. Although not yet widely adopted, these strategies show promise in reintroducing first-line TB drugs, limiting treatment interruptions. Management remains complex, with prolonged hospital stays and high healthcare costs continuing to drive innovation. SUMMARY: The findings support a move towards personalized approaches to TB-DRESS management, with future efforts focused on integrating clinical, genomic, and in-vitro tools to guide risk-stratified reintroduction of TB medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.