ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Landscape-scale endophytic community analyses in replicated grapevine stands reveal that dieback disease is unlikely to be caused by specific fungal communities.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Koch's postulates: the pathobiome paradigm in grapevine esca disease.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Review
- Pathogen Identification and Pathogenicity of Fig (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fungal Pathogen Activity and Stress-Dependent Responses of Grapevine Wood to Esca and Drought.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tree diebacks are complex and multifactorial diseases with suspected biotic and abiotic components. Microbiome effects on plant health are challenging to assess due to the complexity of fungal and bacterial communities. Grapevine wood dieback is the main threat to sustainable production worldwide, and no causality with microbial species has been established despite long-standing claims of fungal drivers. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that grapevine esca disease progression has reproducible drivers in the fungal species community. For this, we analyzed a set of 21 vineyards planted simultaneously with a single susceptible cultivar to provide unprecedented replication at the landscape scale. We sampled a total of 496 plants at the graft union across vineyards in 2 different years to perform deep amplicon sequencing analyses of the fungal communities inhabiting grapevine trunks. The communities were highly diverse with a total of 4,129 amplified sequence variants assigned to 697 distinct species. We detected trunk fungal community shifts over years of sampling, vineyards and climatic conditions, as well as disease status. However, we detect no specific fungal species driving symptom development across vineyards, contrary to long-standing expectations. The high degree of environmental standardization in the decade-long experimental plots and the well-powered replication provide the clearest evidence yet that grapevine wood dieback is most likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens. Furthermore, our study shows how landscape-scale replicated field surveys allow for powerful hypothesis testing for complex dieback disease drivers and prioritize future research directions.IMPORTANCETree diebacks are complex diseases suspected to be caused by both biological and environmental drivers. Grapevine wood dieback is a major threat to vineyards worldwide, but no specific microbial species have been experimentally implicated, despite claims that fungi are causing the symptoms. Here, we tested whether the progression of grapevine esca disease is driven by specific fungal species. We analyzed 21 long-established vineyards planted at the same time with the same susceptible grape variety to ensure consistent conditions. Over the years, we observed changes in the fungal communities inhabiting the trunk depending on the vineyard, climate, and disease status. However, contrary to expectations, we did not detect any specific fungal species that consistently could cause symptoms across the vineyards. The high level of environmental control and replication in our study provides strong evidence that grapevine wood dieback is more likely caused by environmental factors rather than specific pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.