ReviewClinical and translational science2025
Leveraging In Silico and Artificial Intelligence Models to Advance Drug Disposition and Response Predictions Across the Lifespan.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion models for virtual populations and pharmacometric simulations.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hype vs. Health: How Approved Nanomedicines Have Met (or Missed) Early Predictions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Old Drug, New Science: Metformin and the Future of Pharmaceutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical and Translational Science: From Bench Insights to Bedside Impact.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Article
- Leveraging In Silico and Artificial Intelligence Models to Advance Drug Disposition and Response Predictions Across the Lifespan.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporating inter-individual differences in drug disposition and responses is essential for ensuring the safe and effective use of drugs in real-world patients. Despite ongoing efforts, lower participation of children, older individuals, pregnant and breastfeeding women, postmenopausal women, and people with disease states and disabilities in drug clinical trials is frequent, and it requires multifaceted strategies and tools to evaluate drug exposure and responses in broad populations. The availability of modeling and simulation tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and quantitative systems pharmacology/toxicology (QSP/QST) modeling, enables the application of virtual populations that reflect the differences in drug disposition and responses for disease states and different stages of the lifespan. These models integrate clinical trial and real-world data (RWD) to predict drug exposure, efficacy, and safety. Additionally, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) offer powerful tools for analyzing large datasets and identifying key physiological determinants of drug response across the lifespan. This review discusses the application of in silico and AI models to advance the prediction of drug exposure and responses across the lifespan, including examples of virtual populations in PBPK and QSP/QST models. A case study on QST modeling for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in postmenopausal women is presented, along with opportunities and challenges in applying AI for modeling physiological determinants of drug dosing in individuals ranging in age from 12 to > 80 years old in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.