Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40539740›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2025

Leveraging In Silico and Artificial Intelligence Models to Advance Drug Disposition and Response Predictions Across the Lifespan.

Kyunghee Yang, Daniel Gonzalez, Jeffrey L Woodhead, Pallavi Bhargava, Murali Ramanathan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diffusion models for virtual populations and pharmacometric simulations.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyunghee YangQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7009-0944
Daniel GonzalezDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5522-5686
Jeffrey L WoodheadQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc, North Carolina, USA.
Pallavi BhargavaQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2556-9554
Murali RamanathanArtificial Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Neurology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-150X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating inter-individual differences in drug disposition and responses is essential for ensuring the safe and effective use of drugs in real-world patients. Despite ongoing efforts, lower participation of children, older individuals, pregnant and breastfeeding women, postmenopausal women, and people with disease states and disabilities in drug clinical trials is frequent, and it requires multifaceted strategies and tools to evaluate drug exposure and responses in broad populations. The availability of modeling and simulation tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and quantitative systems pharmacology/toxicology (QSP/QST) modeling, enables the application of virtual populations that reflect the differences in drug disposition and responses for disease states and different stages of the lifespan. These models integrate clinical trial and real-world data (RWD) to predict drug exposure, efficacy, and safety. Additionally, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) offer powerful tools for analyzing large datasets and identifying key physiological determinants of drug response across the lifespan. This review discusses the application of in silico and AI models to advance the prediction of drug exposure and responses across the lifespan, including examples of virtual populations in PBPK and QSP/QST models. A case study on QST modeling for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in postmenopausal women is presented, along with opportunities and challenges in applying AI for modeling physiological determinants of drug dosing in individuals ranging in age from 12 to > 80 years old in drug development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationLongevityModels, BiologicalAgedChildFemaleHumansMachine LearningAIclinical pharmacologydrug developmentMLpharmacokineticsreal‐world data

Identifiers

PMID40539740
PMCPMC12180087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.