ArticlePain2025
Factors influencing the recruitment of diverse populations into pain research: findings from a qualitative study with underrepresented participants.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe inclusion of diverse populations in pain research is crucial to obtaining a complete understanding of how the biopsychosocial experience of pain is seen through the lens of different populations. Traditionally, individuals who identify as Black/African American or Hispanic/Latino have not participated in early phase clinical trials, and as a result, their unique perspectives of the management of pain have not been included in study results. In this qualitative research study, we sought to uncover barriers that prevent diverse populations from participating in pain treatment clinical trials. Partnering with a community organization, we used a semistructured interview to conduct nine focus groups among underrepresented populations to obtain these perspectives. A total of 54 patients with ages ranging from 23 to 77 years old were recruited for this study. Of the patients recruited for the study, 74% identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 24% identified as Hispanic/Latino. Results were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic saturation using inductive qualitative content analysis. Results uncovered an array of different perspectives including the recognition of historical wrongs that lead to mistrust of the research and healthcare systems. However, other perspectives include recognition that the location of study sites, time required for participation, and overall accessibility of the study play a significant role in an individual's willingness to participate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.