ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Acceptability of misoprostol-only medication abortion dispensed by mail-order or retail pharmacy: a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews in the United States.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The WHO recommends two medication abortion regimens, either misoprostol used with mifepristone or misoprostol-only. Both regimens are recognised as safe and effective, but in the United States (US) most abortions are completed using mifepristone and misoprostol. Given current political hostility to abortion, restrictions on mifepristone, and the long-term legal strategy to restrict nationwide access to the combined mifepristone and misoprostol regimen, more people in the US may use misoprostol-only regimens. Globally research has documented experiences with misoprostol-only abortions, but what are the experiences among people living in the US? We conducted a thematic analysis of 31 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed their abortion using misoprostol acquired from a mail-order or retail pharmacy between May and June 2020. We examine the acceptability of using misoprostol for medication abortion across three domains: the medication regimen, the mode of delivery of medications, and the overall model of care. We find that individual perceptions of misoprostol were shaped by both prior and informed knowledge. Picking up misoprostol from a retail pharmacy fostered familiarity, and having a prescription legitimised the service as an authentic medication provider. Receiving medications from the mail-order delivery model met preferences for privacy and anonymity. In reflections on the overall model, satisfaction was high across participants, but those who were adolescents at the time of their abortion had a distinct unmet need for emotional support compared to older participants. These results contribute to a growing evidence base on the acceptability of misoprostol-only regimens and mail-order and retail pharmacy service delivery models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.