Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40539236›Full record

ReviewHistology and histopathology2026

Osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD) and adamantinoma: A comprehensive review and updates.

Radhika Jayan, Bharat Rekhi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Histology and histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radhika JayanTata Memorial Centre Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Bharat RekhiTata Memorial Centre Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Rekhi.bharat@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD) and adamantinoma constitute rare bone tumors. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue and bone tumors stratifies adamantinoma into three main subtypes, namely OFD-like adamantinoma, classic adamantinoma, including its various growth patterns, and an extremely uncommon subtype, dedifferentiated adamantinoma. Given the wide clinicopathological spectrum of adamantinoma, several tumors constitute the differential diagnoses. An exact diagnosis in these scenarios has significant treatment-related implications, such as synovial sarcoma vs. spindle cell-type adamantinoma, and metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma vs. adamantinoma, to name but a few. There have been studies attempting to explore the proximity/relationship between OFD, OFD-like adamantinoma, and classic adamantinoma. This review focuses on the clinical, radiological, and pathological features of OFD, as well as the histopathological spectrum of adamantinoma, including its updates and various subtypes and tumors that constitute its differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdamantinomaBone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumans

Identifiers

PMID40539236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.