ReviewCureus2025
C5 Nerve Palsy After Posterior Instrumentation and Decompression in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior versus posterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Laminectomy vs. laminoplasty for treating multi-segment cervical canal stenosis combined with central cord syndrome in the absence of fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C5 nerve palsy is a well-documented postoperative complication of cervical spine surgery, particularly following posterior decompression and fixation procedures. With incidence rates reported between 4% and 30%, it poses significant clinical challenges due to its impact on upper limb function and patient quality of life. Typically emerging within one to four weeks post-surgery, C5 palsy is marked by deltoid and biceps muscle weakness and sensory deficits in the C5 distribution. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving spinal cord shift, reperfusion injury, and foraminal stenosis, with surgical factors such as decompression extent and alignment correction also contributing. While most cases respond favorably to conservative management, including physical rehabilitation, some patients experience prolonged recovery or residual deficits. Recovery rates range from 71% to 96%, emphasizing the importance of individualized rehabilitation protocols. Anatomical predispositions, preoperative conditions, and surgical techniques are critical in both the development and management of this complication. Continued research is needed to refine predictive models and tailor treatment strategies based on patient-specific and procedural variables. This review study aims to collect available data and summarize the information available in the medical community according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.