Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40539177›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Simulation-Based Education and Nursing Student Learning Motivations: A Scoping Review.

Keisuke Nojima, Ryosuke Yoshida, Seiichi Sato, Tomohide Fukuda, Kanae Kakinuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keisuke NojimaFaculty of Nursing, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, JPN.
Ryosuke YoshidaDepartment of Nursing, University of Osaka Hospital, Suita, JPN.
Seiichi SatoFaculty of Nursing, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, JPN.
Tomohide FukudaFaculty of Nursing, Musashino University, Koto, JPN.
Kanae KakinumaDepartment of Nursing, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to explore how simulation-based learning (SBL) influences learning motivation among undergraduate nursing students and to clarify the factors within SBL that contribute to increased motivation. A scoping review methodology was employed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting standards. Literature published between January 2014 and November 2024 was systematically searched across MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PubMed using relevant keywords based on the population-concept-context (PCC) framework. Studies were selected and reviewed by multiple independent reviewers, and data were extracted and analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Twenty-one studies were included. SBL was found to positively influence nursing students' intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, critical thinking, and academic engagement. Simulation modalities included high-fidelity simulation, virtual reality, video-based learning, and standardized patients. Key motivational factors identified were realism in clinical scenarios, opportunities for repetition and reflection, structured debriefing, and emotionally engaging learning environments. Integration with problem-based learning and immersive technologies further enhanced learner engagement. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, the need for trained facilitators, and limited adaptability to diverse learner needs were noted. This review offers insight into how SBL strategies can be optimized to support both cognitive and emotional aspects of learning motivation in nursing education and contributes to the literature by systematically mapping motivational factors across diverse simulation modalities.

Indexed as

learning motivationsnursing educationnursing studentsimulation-based educationsimulation-based learning

Identifiers

PMID40539177
PMCPMC12178444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.