ReviewCureus2025
Simulation-Based Education and Nursing Student Learning Motivations: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory-practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Virtual Simulation Game on the Development of Nursing Students' Knowledge and Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nursing open · 2026Trial
- Career commitment and sense of calling in nursing students: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A reflective learning conversation debriefing model for interprofessional simulation based education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to explore how simulation-based learning (SBL) influences learning motivation among undergraduate nursing students and to clarify the factors within SBL that contribute to increased motivation. A scoping review methodology was employed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting standards. Literature published between January 2014 and November 2024 was systematically searched across MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PubMed using relevant keywords based on the population-concept-context (PCC) framework. Studies were selected and reviewed by multiple independent reviewers, and data were extracted and analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Twenty-one studies were included. SBL was found to positively influence nursing students' intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, critical thinking, and academic engagement. Simulation modalities included high-fidelity simulation, virtual reality, video-based learning, and standardized patients. Key motivational factors identified were realism in clinical scenarios, opportunities for repetition and reflection, structured debriefing, and emotionally engaging learning environments. Integration with problem-based learning and immersive technologies further enhanced learner engagement. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, the need for trained facilitators, and limited adaptability to diverse learner needs were noted. This review offers insight into how SBL strategies can be optimized to support both cognitive and emotional aspects of learning motivation in nursing education and contributes to the literature by systematically mapping motivational factors across diverse simulation modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.