ArticleCytoJournal2025
Proposal for including risk of malignancy and clinical management in the Japanese system for reporting thyroid cytopathology - A multi-institutional study.
Article in CytoJournal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Japanese System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (JSRTC) does not include the risks of malignancies (ROMs) or recommended clinical management. This multi-institutional study aimed to determine the frequency, re-aspiration rate, resection rate, ROM, and clinical management options in seven different categories. Material and Methods: For 15,495 cases of thyroid fine-needle aspiration performed at seven Japanese institutions without molecular testing, the frequency, re-aspiration rate, resection rate, ROM, and clinical management options of each diagnostic category were examined. The categorization was based on JSRTC, and cases were subdivided into those with nuclear atypia and other subtypes for undetermined significance. Results: Re-aspiration of unsatisfactory and undermined significance diagnostic categories was mainly performed for cases of suspected malignancy on ultrasound. The median re-aspiration rate of cyst fluid nodules was 4.9%, which was significantly different from that (17.8%) of unsatisfactory cases ( Conclusion: Overall, this study determines the frequency, ROM, and recommended clinical management for thyroid cytopathology in Japan. These results were different from those proposed by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. In the future, our results will be helpful in the revision of JSRTC and will contribute to improving the outcomes among Japanese patients with thyroid nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.