Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40539037›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Medial Implantable Shock Absorber (MISHA) to Treat Medial Knee Arthritis in an Active Patient.

Yazdan Raji, Begum Topkarci, Monica S Vel, Wyatt Andersen, Robert M Putko, Seth L Sherman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implantable Shock Absorber: Breakthrough or Hype?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yazdan RajiStanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Redwood City, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-9125
Begum TopkarciGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Monica S VelStanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Redwood City, California, USA.
Wyatt AndersenStanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Redwood City, California, USA.
Robert M PutkoStanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Redwood City, California, USA.
Seth L ShermanStanford University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Redwood City, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability worldwide and most commonly affects the knee. Conservative management has limited long-term efficacy, and traditional surgical options present inherent challenges for the high-demand patient population, creating a treatment gap. Medial implantable shock absorber (MISHA) technology has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for active patients with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis who are either unable or unwilling to undergo high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or arthroplasty. Select advantages include early return to full weightbearing without bracing, reversibility without "burning bridges," and favorable patient-reported outcomes. Indications: We present a 58-year-old female, active military officer with a 9-month history of symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis who had conservative measures that failed. Following informed consent regarding surgical options, the patient underwent left knee arthroscopy followed by open implantation of the MISHA Knee Implant. Results: Medial internal shock absorbers can serve to shield the medial compartment from abnormal loads, reduce pain, and improve function without altering the native knee joint or lower extremity anatomy. In a prospective nonrandomized cohort study supervised by the FDA, a comparison between MISHA and HTO demonstrated the favorable outcomes of the MISHA group in terms of pain, function, adverse events, implant integrity, and conversion surgery at the primary end point of 24 months. Discussion/Conclusion: In this surgical technique, we outline the key steps for implantation of the medial internal shock absorber to treat symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis in an active patient. We also review technical pearls and pitfalls and postoperative care, including rehabilitation and return to activity timelines and expectations. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

internal shock absorbermedial knee osteoarthritisoutcomespearls and pitfallssurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID40539037
PMCPMC12177428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.