ReviewDEN open2026
Management Strategies for Refractory Esophageal Varices.
Review in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory esophageal varices that are difficult to control or unresponsive to endoscopic treatment remain a major clinical challenge in the management of portal hypertension. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment strategies for these cases, along with a comparative analysis of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Baveno VII, and Japanese clinical practice guidelines. Treatment approaches are classified into four domains: endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology (IVR), surgical procedures, and internal medicine-based strategies. In recent years, clinical practice has shifted from traditional surgical interventions and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to minimally invasive IVR techniques, such as partial splenic embolization, percutaneous transhepatic obliteration, and transileocolic vein obliteration, often combined with endoscopic methods. In Japan, where TIPS is not routinely performed due to limited availability and lack of insurance coverage, these alternative IVR procedures are more commonly utilized. Differences among regional guidelines highlight the need for adaptable treatment strategies based on local resources and institutional expertise. Effective management of refractory cases requires multidisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating international evidence with local clinical practice to develop a tailored, team-based approach that improves outcomes in patients with complex variceal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.