ArticleJournal of food science and technology2025
Ultrasound-assisted process to improve proteins recovery from industrial canola and soybean byproducts.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional and Functional Potential of Rapeseed and Canola Proteins: Advances in Protein Extraction, Phenolic Removal, and Food Applications.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Proteomic Evidence Indicates Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Enhances Recovery of Membrane-Associated Proteins inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Production, characterization, and functional properties of protein concentrate from Momordica cochinchinensis seeds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unveiling the potential of beetroot leaf as a sustainable source of proteins: insights into ultrasound-assisted extraction, functional properties and in vitro digestibility.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Productivity on Functional Properties and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Proteins from By-Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diversity of Effects of Mechanical Influences on Living Systems and Aqueous Solutions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An ultrasound-assisted process is proposed to obtain protein isolates from canola and soybean byproducts. A laboratory-scale probe system (24 kHz, 400W) was used for protein extraction and six levels of energy density were analyzed. Different mixtures of solvents (water, ethanol, methanol, acetone) and temperatures were tested for removing phenolic compounds, and the best results were obtained with ethanol-water (8:2 v/v) and energy density of 104 kJ/L, which minimize protein losses at that step. After extraction of phenolic compounds, samples were alkalinized (pH 12 or 9.5), subjected to ultrasound treatment and the protein precipitated at the isoelectric pH. The highest yield on protein extraction was obtained with 1:20 meal: NaOH solution ratio, applying 150 kJ/L at constant temperature (30 °C), increasing the protein recovery, 72.5% for canola meal and 37.5% for soybean meal, compared to the conventional method. The solubility of both isolates obtained with ultrasound improved ~ 50% at a pH close to neutral and basic, with an increase in free sulfhydryl groups, without significant effects of ultrasound treatment on the subunit fractions of the proteins. These results provide alternatives to develop protein isolates from an undervalued by-product, with better techno-functional properties that can be employed in the food industry. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-024-06108-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.