ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A space-gamified approach to examine muscle contraction behaviour in children and adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy: feasibility, acceptability and repeatbility.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common disease affecting mobility among children. However, relatively little is known about the muscle phenotype and the resulting impairments in muscle function of this population. We therefore examined feasibility and acceptability of a muscle testing protocol that is based on the muscle examinations of astronauts and in bed-rest studies in children and adolescents with CP (clinical trial registry number DRKS00031107). Methods: Twelve participants, aged between 8 and 18 years, with CP and age-matched able-bodied counterparts (Ctrl) have been included to the study. They completed testing procedures on two visits. Participants performed isometric maximum voluntary contractions, step and ramp contractions in plantarflexion on a custom build dynamometer. The tasks were visualized using a torque-controlled video game. We computed steadiness, defined as standard deviation of the fluctuations, and slope, as well as the achieved MVC. Data were statistically analyzed via Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for between-visit analysis and Mann-Whitney U test for between-group analysis. Results: One participant of the CP group was not able to perform the tasks and dropped out for the second visit. Especially younger children and children with cognitive impairments were not able to adequately answer the acceptance questionnaire. The MVC of Ctrl was higher in both visits and was excellently repeatable. During step contractions Ctrl showed lower fluctuations in both visits. Also, during ascending ramp contractions Ctrl showed less fluctuations but only at visit 1. During descending ramp contractions steadiness was better in Ctrl at both visits. Performance parameters were all poorly repeatable, because the CP group improved their performance in all tasks at visit 2. Discussion: Application of our gamified muscle testing protocol was well acceptable and mostly feasible. Contrasting with constant isometric contractions and decreasing ramp contractions, the performance of children with CP during ascending ramp contractions improved to the level of control subjects within 2 visits. A crucial prerequisite to perform successful measurements are good cognitive skills and at least one familiarization visit. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031107, identifier (DRKS00031107).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.