ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Obstetric violence: perspectives from mothers, midwives, and obstetricians.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Available Scales and Tools Used to Measure Obstetric Violence.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Obstetric Violence Through the Perspectives of Women and Midwives in Hospital Birth Settings: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Obstetric violence and associated factors among women who gave birth at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024: a cross-sectional study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Disrespect, Abuse, and Satisfaction With Facility-Based Childbirth in Rural Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Mapping the gendered dynamics of cesarean section: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Indonesian Patients' Experiences and Emotional Attachment to Healthcare Services Abroad: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the majority of the 140 million annual births occur without complications. Women desire a positive birth experience based on respectful care, clear information, and emotional support, which enables them to make informed decisions and maintain control over their reproductive process. However, many women experience disrespectful or abusive treatment during obstetric care, with lasting consequences for both their physical and mental health. This study explores the factors that influence respectful maternal care and the phenomenon of obstetric violence, as perceived by mothers, midwives, and obstetricians. Methodology: A qualitative study using a phenomenological approach was conducted in eight public and private hospitals in the Girona Health Region (Catalonia, Spain) between 2021 and 2022. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight mothers and eight healthcare professionals (midwives and obstetricians) selected through purposive sampling. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis to identify meaningful units and key themes. Results: The narratives collected allowed for the identification of key elements of non-respectful maternal care. A lack of information during pregnancy and childbirth emerged as a central concern for both mothers and professionals, affecting their sense of control and satisfaction. Poor communication with healthcare providers, particularly with anaesthesiologists and obstetricians, was perceived as a barrier to quality care. Mothers reported experiences of disrespect, the absence of informed consent for procedures such as episiotomies, and paternalistic treatment. Obstetricians showed resistance to the term "obstetric violence," while midwives recognized it as practices and attitudes that negatively affect the maternal experience. Conclusions: The discrepancy between professional perspectives and mothers' experiences highlights the urgent need for transformation in obstetric care. It is crucial to promote a care model based on evidence, effective communication, and respect for women's rights. Incorporating a gender perspective into healthcare training and strengthening public policies to ensure respectful obstetric care are essential measures to improve the quality of care and prevent obstetric violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.