ArticleActa medica Philippina2025
A Scoping Review on the Status of Clinical Simulation in Healthcare Education in the Philippines.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the implementation of clinical simulation as a learning tool: an 18-month experience at a university hospital.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation immerses learners in guided replications of real-life experiences. Simulation-based learning in the health profession allows trainees and professionals to practice skills in a controlled environment using various modalities, enhancing patient safety and minimizing clinical errors. Objective: To describe the profile of Philippine studies on clinical simulation in healthcare professional education and assess the methodological quality of these studies. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of studies on clinical simulation studies in healthcare education in the Philippines. We followed the methods for scoping review and reported using the PRISMA Scoping review checklist. We searched for relevant studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Herdin, and Cochrane) as of May 17, 2024, and summarized descriptive data on the characteristics of the study, population, clinical simulation technique, and outcomes, using graphical summaries and tables. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI). Results: We included 13 studies mostly published in the 2020s (7), by faculty as main author (9), with hospital affiliation (10), single-center (11), setting in NCR (11), analytic (10), medical field (10), educational purpose (7), using task trainers (5), low- to medium-fidelity (11), with technical competencies (mostly skills) as desired outcome (9), median sample size of 40, and including mostly postgraduate level participants (7). There was moderate methodological quality (median MMERSQI score, 51 [range, 40, 77] with the 'type of data' item being highly reported and 'validity of instrument tool' item poorly reported. Conclusion: The observed gaps in methodological rigor, study design, and fidelity of simulation techniques in healthcare education in the Philippines highlight opportunities for advancing the field. Future research should aim to address these gaps, particularly by increasing the use of RCTs, enhancing the validity of measurement tools, and incorporating comprehensive simulation components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.