ReviewChemical science2025
Orbital-based bonding analysis in solids.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding and Designing Phase Change Materials: Insights From Atom Probe Tomography.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Generalized valences and oxidation scores for solids.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Tools for Understanding Molecular Orbital Interactions of Molecules on SurfacesDensity Functional Theory Calculations of HIndustrial & engineering chemistry research · 2026Article
- Stabilization of Fully Deprotonated Melaminate Anions (CJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Ambient-pressure superconductivity in covalent Au-B frameworks stabilized by electropositive metals.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- Anderson's negative-Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As of today, there is certainly no doubt about the quantum character of the atomistic world, most straightforwardly calculated by using wave mechanics and Schrödinger's fundamental equation from 1926. Even though one century has passed, the paramount importance of the wave function, which determines everything down to the last detail, remains unchanged, and the wave function is most conveniently approximated by a combination of orbitals, one-electron wave functions for atoms, molecules, and also solids. And it is precisely this "orbital basis" that serves as a gateway to understanding the very interactions that cause atoms to condense into solids, just like for molecules. The analysis of quantum-chemical interactions and the nature of the chemical bonding between atoms in solids by use of orbitals will be our topic in this perspective, starting with the glorious past, going over to the current practice and, of course, the magnificent prospects for the future. As electronic structures for periodic solids are most often calculated using plane waves (instead of orbitals), for simple reasons of translational symmetry and Bloch's fundamental theorem, a unitary transformation to atomic or molecular orbitals is needed for final inspection, technically solved by the LOBSTER quantum-chemistry package. LOBSTER allows for the calculation of wave function-based atomic charges, various population analyses and periodic bonding indicators, first-principles bond orders, two- and multi-centre bonding analysis, fragment-molecular analysis, and a lot more. All those techniques are illustrated from three solid-state systems deriving from carbonate chemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.