ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Transcriptome analysis of historic olives reveals stress-specific biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dehydration Stress Memory Genes in Tomato (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic and Phenotypic Variations Within Ancient 'Mehras' Olive (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Population Genetic Structure of Historic Olives (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Water scarcity and soil salinization are increasingly becoming limiting factors in food production, including olives, a major fruit crop in several parts of the world. Investigating historical olives, which are the last resort for genetic resources, is essential due to their natural resilience to drought and salinity, making them valuable for breeding stress-tolerant cultivars and ensuring sustainable olive production. Methods: In this study, four historic olive cultivars ('Nabali', 'Mehras', 'Frantoio', and 'Manzanillo') were investigated under both drought and salinity stresses. These cultivars also preserve local biodiversity, support traditional agriculture, and offer economic opportunities through unique, heritage-based olive oils. Drought and salt stress in olives are assessed through physiological [the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm), relative water content (RWC)], biochemical (proline content), and molecular (stress-responsive genes) analyses to evaluate stress tolerance. Results: Under salinity and drought stress, RWC decreased in all olive cultivars, with drought having the most severe impact. 'Nabali' exhibited the highest salinity tolerance, while all cultivars showed similar sensitivity to drought. Proline levels remained stable in 'Mehras' but decreased under salinity stress in 'Frantoio', 'Manzanillo', and 'Nabali'. Higher proline accumulation under drought suggested better drought tolerance than salinity in these cultivars. Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) declined under salinity and drought stress in all cultivars, with drought causing a more significant reduction. 'Manzanillo' showed the highest sensitivity to drought, while the other cultivars maintained moderate efficiency under stress. 'Manzanillo' and 'Mehras' exhibited the highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under both drought and salinity stress, with 'Manzanillo' showing 2,934 DEGs under drought and 664 under salinity stress, while 'Mehras' had 2,034 and 2,866 DEGs, respectively. 'Nabali' demonstrated the strongest salinity-specific response, with 3,803 DEGs under salinity stress compared to 1,346 under drought. 'Frantoio' consistently had the lowest number of DEGs, with 345 under drought and 512 under salinity stress, indicating a more stable transcriptional response. Comparative analyses between drought and salinity conditions revealed significant variations, with 'Manzanillo' showing 2,599 unique DEGs under drought relative to salinity stress, while 'Nabali' exhibited 2,666 DEGs under salinity stress relative to drought. The major novel upregulated genes under salinity stress were Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase hydrolase (7 fold in 'Nabali' and 6.9 fold in 'Mehras'). The novel drought genes detected in 'Frantoio' included Phytosulfokines 3 (4.9 fold), while Allene oxide synthase (6.5 fold) and U-box domain-containing (6.4 fold) were detected in 'Manzanillo'. Discussion: The data revealed both novel and common stress-specific biomarkers under both salinity and drought stress, which can potentially be utilized in olive breeding and genetic improvement programs to mitigate stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.