ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
The relationship between microclimate factors and fruit quality in different tree canopies of Xiahui No. 8 peach trees.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Canopy Position on the Biochemical, Nutritional, and Nutraceutical Quality Characteristics of Grapefruit Cultivars During Fruit Growth and Development.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal optimization of micro-spray misting for orchard microclimate regulation and water-use efficiency in semi-arid apple orchards.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Time-resolved transcriptomic analysis reveals key regulatory genes and auxin-responsive networks underlying axillary bud branching inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Canopy Design Drives Photosynthetic Performance, Light Environment, and Fruit Quality in Peach (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, 6-year-old Xiahui No. 8 peach trees were used to investigate the effects of microclimates on their fruit quality between open-center and Y-shaped tree canopies. The impacts of the two canopy structures on light distribution, temperature, and relative humidity (RH) within the canopy, and their correlation with fruit quality metrics such as weight, hardness, soluble solid content (SSC), and dry matter content (DMC) were analyzed. The open-center-shaped trees had more favorable light distribution, with higher light intensity in the upper canopy layers and a larger light interception area, leading to improved fruit yield and quality compared to Y-shaped trees. The open-center-shaped trees also had higher single fruit weight, percentage of large fruits, SSC, flesh DMC and fruit hardness. However, free acidity showed only a minor difference between the two tree shapes. The study also found significant differences in the fruit coloration across canopy layers, with fruits in the upper layers exhibiting better coloration and higher SSC. Light intensity ranged from 30-90% and was strongly and positively correlated with fruit quality, thereby influencing the fruit size, coloration, and sugar-acid ratio. Overall, the open-center-shaped trees prove to be more conducive to improving fruit quality and yield. Nevertheless, proper management of the tree shapes, branch distribution, and light intensity is essential in optimizing fruit quality and maximizing the economic benefits of peach orchards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.